One minute, supporters of President Trump are elated at the executive orders he signed on Day 1 of his new presidency. Only two genders now acknowledged by the government, WHO no longer funded by the US, DEI eliminated, armed services personnel who refused the COVID shots, leading to their loss of employment, being re-instated and back paid, the end of the Paris Climate Accord and other wonderful pushbacks. But then the bad news : deals with Bill Gates? For ‘Microsoft’, I read Bill Gates. Why is this man still free following his role in the COVID travesty? Billions of people forced into taking COVID injections? Instead, Gates has been rewarded by being one of the recipients of a half trillion dollar deal to create mRNA injections for cancer treatment and somehow AI is involved in the whole thing. Getting cancer is a call to modify living and eating habits. As a nutritionist, I have done some reading on cancer. A couple of quotes I came upon along the way were from Hippocrates, a doctor from over two and half thousand years ago, and Paracelsus, from 600 years ago, both of whose wisdom is as relevant today as it was then:
‘It is better not to apply any treatment in cases of occult [i.e.,hidden] cancer; for, if treated, the patients die quickly; but if not treated, they hold out for a long time.’ (Hippocrates)
‘It should be forbidden and severely punished to remove cancer by cutting, burning, cautery and other fiendish tortures. It is from nature that the disease arises and from nature comes the cure.’ Paracelsus(1493–1541)
CANCER: DIAGNOSIS AND CONVENTIONAL TREATMENTS (CANCER: THE COMPLETE RECOVERY GUIDE SERIES BOOK 2) by Jonathan Chamberlain
The point is that cancer can be seen as the body’s call for change – change in diet and lifestyle. Something is wrong. The body can’t cope anymore. Do something differently. So many opinions arise, some better than others. What to do when a cancer diagnosis comes? Diet is medicine. Lifestyle is medicine. But it takes time. It possibly took years for cancer to develop in a person and it will take years for it to shrink. Healthy people are developing cancers all the time but their immune systems can cope with annihilating these small cancers. That’s what our immune systems do for us. But we have to treat our bodies with care. Dr Max Gerson had healed patients, at the point of death due to advanced cancer, through his radical treatments and fought for the right to promote his approach and to question the allopathic medicine approach to cancer. There have been battles over who holds the reins of power in cancer management and cure at the level of US legislation. From the mid 20th century to now, billions of dollars continue to be spent on cancer research and treatment, often involving much pain for the cancer sufferer, emotional and physical. Still, it remains the dreaded disease. What follows is an account of the political manoeuvrings concerning a bill in the USA in 1946. It was designed to allow for the modest funding of research into natural approaches to healing cancer, the so-considered quackery approach.
“There would be no Pepper-Neely Bill to appropriate a hundred million dollars for cancer research if the existing research were coping with the need.
“… I have spoken about this carefully and abstractly, which is to lose some of the shock and delight of the experience yesterday at the hearing of the Pepper Committee. It is one thing to talk abstractly about chemistry and diet and vitamins and other factors in medical science. It is another to see, as the Committee yesterday saw, a seventeen-year-old girl, who had had a tumor at the base of the brain, which was inoperable, and which had paralyzed her. Yesterday she walked without assistance to the witness chair, and told clearly about her case and her treatment. There was a sturdy man, who had been sergeant in the army, had had a malignant tumor, also at the base of the brain, which had been operated but needed deep X-ray treatment, and this he could not receive because of the danger to the brain. Yesterday he was the picture of health as he testified and quite naturally he was proud of his remarkable recovery. There was a woman who had had cancer of the breast which had spread. Yesterday, she was well and testified with poise and confidence.
“A few cases showing such improvement cannot of themselves affect the outlook of the medical profession. But they are attested facts and not flukes, and as such they have to be accounted for. And there are many, many more cases which could have been cited. It would seem to be the business of medical research to leap on such facts, and carry every hopeful indication to a final, conservative conclusion.
“So the advocates of the Pepper-Neely bill can argue that unless we learn now how to deal successfully with cancer many million persons now living in this country are condemned to die from cancer. A hundred million dollars is little more than a token payment for America to make to avert such a sweep of death, and they can then point to the Gerson dietary approach as a most promising field for research. Already it has achieved results, which while relatively few, are astounding and challenging.
“Dr. Gerson was an eminent if controversial figure in preHitler Germany. He was bound to be controversial because he was challenging established practice in treating illnesses as tuberculosis by diet. He has been assistant to Foerster, the great neurologist of Breslau, and for years assistant to Sauerbruch, one of the great physicians on the Continent. The Sauerbruch-Gerson diet for skin tuberculosis is well-known to European medicine and the account of it is part of accepted medical literature. Dr. Gerson told the Pepper Committee that he had first come upon his dietary theory in trying to cure himself of migraine headaches. Later he treated others, among them a man with skin tuberculosis as well. Dr. Gerson was an acknowledged dietary authority in Weimar, Germany, and was responsible for the German Army of his time being placed on dehydrated rather than canned foods.”
But all the hope and promise and excitement were for naught. Today, the Pepper-Neely bill, which might have opened the door to a new life of worry-free health for the present and future generations of the world, which might have saved uncountable lives, itself lies forgotten behind closed doors, a dusty testament of man’s eternal folly and a legacy of bitterness for the children.
Haught, S. J.. Censored For Curing Cancer – The American Experience of Dr. Max Gerson (pp. 89-91). Dauphin Publications. Kindle Edition.
Question the prevailing narrative about cancer:
The cancer survivor discovers that there is a definite belief system about malignancy programmed into allopathic doctors that trickles down to medical consumers through the journalistic media, which invariably take their material from organized medicine’s propaganda mechanisms. This programming states: “Cancer is death; it is tumor; tumor is autonomous; under no circumstances can it be conquered!” If accepted by a cancer patient, these erroneous beliefs severely hinder recovery and are likely to come true. Alternately, when they are not believed their falsity becomes apparent, and the person with cancer survives splendidly.1 A second set of falsehoods leveled at the public by a brainwashed North American medical orthodoxy is that (1) surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy is the only effective cancer treatment, and all other therapies should be considered quackery; (2) biopsy, excision of the lump accompanied by a pathology examination, CAT scans, mammograms, X-ray films, and other forms of high technology are the most reliable diagnostic methods; (3) food quality and good nutrition have no effect upon cancer’s progress; (4) early detection and treatment increase the odds of survival; and (5) if someone with cancer lives five years, such an interval counts as a cure of the disease. The above five propaganda pronouncements are unmitigated myths perpetrated by the cancer industry, usually for financial gain. The knowing cancer survivor recognizes statements such as these as coming from allopathic sources. He/she knows that they are sheer fantasies, and subsequently, develops more accurate personal beliefs based on observation and education. “Identifying these fabrications as altogether wrong and harmful to the ill individual, I know there must be a more effective way to gain healing and health maintenance,” says the “incurable disease” survivor who puts the lie to such an inaccurate label. This positive-minded patient seeks out and finds the better way. In doing so, he or she becomes totally confident and self-reliant. Some survivors discover their inspiration through the actions of an empathetic health professional who has become disenchanted with the various conventional myths of medicine. This doctor radiates love for patients who eventually do push him or her into some form of alternative method of healing—a rare physician who deserves to be cherished. Other patients become inspired by the testimonies of survivors who are proof that cancer or another illness is reversible. Tumor, for instance, turns out to merely be a symptom of some pathology that’s treatable, but to which treatment had not yet been applied. The “incurable disease” survivor becomes anchored in reality. He/she wastes no time searching for “silver bullets” or some anticancer vaccine or another form of “miracle” cure repeatedly being promised but never delivered by the cancer establishment. It’s realized by the sophisticated individual that our cancer industry reaps vast profits each time it predicts such a cure if only enough money could be donated.
Gerson, Charlotte; Walker, Morton. The Gerson Therapy — Revised And Updated: The Natural Nutritional Program to Fight Cancer and Other Illnesses (pp. 342-344). Kensington Books. Kindle Edition.
I am not necessarily promoting the Gerson system of healing but he was successful in treating many with his approach. And I certainly acknowledge the many successful surgeries and other allopathic treatments in many cases. But there are others where much pain and false hope has been endured by the patient, only to die in a relatively short time following surgery. Another way is possible in cancer treatment but that way is not wanted. Furthermore, Dr Gerson’s approach provides true health restoration and the elimination, not just management, of cancer. It is refused by a very powerful “establishment” that is often more motivated by making money than healing. This is, of course, not true for many in the medical profession but Big Pharma has had too much influence and power over medical schools for too long.
So to the AI-cancer research programs. I hope there will be close scrutiny over the research, development and rollout of these new cancer technologies. Transhumanism is a threat. Personal choice in health care remains precarious, depending on who is in power now and in the future. There were surely lessons to be learned from the ill-effects at the height of the COVID-era mandates. So many instances of death and disability followed vaccinations. Businesses closed down. There were family separations enforced even in the event of a family member dying. Never again. May coercion play no part in any future vaccine development, especially as cancer is a preventable disease through measures that the likes of RFK Jr has in mind. The natural and commonsensical path to prevention and even healing of chronic diseases is the best path of all.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here on healthcare are my own and are not intended to replace professional, personalised medical advice. Medical needs vary from individual to individual. Please seek medical advice from a trusted health practitioner of your choice for your particular medical condition.
Our World Our Faith 